Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:37:29 11/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 2003 at 11:53:36, Matthew Hull wrote: >On November 18, 2003 at 11:50:14, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On November 18, 2003 at 10:46:17, Daniel Clausen wrote: >> >>>On November 18, 2003 at 10:34:36, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>[snip] >>> >>>>I think the former, myself. Just listen to comments on various chess servers >>>>for today's games. The GM players are beginning to claim that they are >>>>"computer experts" yet it is painfully obvious (to me anyway) that for the >>>>most part, they have no idea how a computer actually plays chess. But it seems >>>>to be "in vogue" to have an understanding of computer chess, and many can claim >>>>it and not be discovered. >>> >>>A positive example of a titled player when it comes to good comments about >>>computerchess is Kingway(IM) in my opinion. >>> >>>Sargon >> >> >>Kim is a good player, and he and I have had many long discussions about >>computers >>and chess on ICC. His understanding of how computers play chess is very good. >>Another (although I haven't seen him in a long time) is canadian IM (maybe >>GM by now) Brian Hartmann who used to play as "ADOLF" on ICC. >> >>You also might ask Roman a question or two. He'll amaze you. :) >> >>Roman "stole the show" at the 1997 DB match when he was on stage giving >>analysis. It was far better than anyone else there, Joel included. > > >Roman thinks the match is scripted, as per his comments on ICC Sunday. > >MH Who knows? He may well be right for all we know. I doubt it, but there's no way to _know_.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.