Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: About CC-events in the US

Author: Matthew Hull

Date: 09:02:56 11/19/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 19, 2003 at 11:51:59, martin fierz wrote:

>On November 19, 2003 at 11:34:17, Matthew Hull wrote:
>
>>On November 19, 2003 at 11:30:37, martin fierz wrote:
>>
>>>On November 19, 2003 at 11:06:21, Matthew Hull wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 19, 2003 at 10:55:26, martin fierz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On November 19, 2003 at 10:31:54, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>here.  Makes a _lot_ of sense.  And it shows just how "world" aware the
>>>>>>ICCA actually is.
>>>>>
>>>>>i don't really want to be involved in this thread, but i can't resist this
>>>>>one...
>>>>>
>>>>>disclaimer: of course it would be much more sensible to have the championship in
>>>>>the US from time to time.
>>>>>
>>>>>cheapo: so the ICCA does something which is not good for *one* country
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>That's one cheapo that doesn't work.  It would be like 2000 years ago holding
>>>>gladiator events that discommode only one country, Rome.
>>>>
>>>>MH
>>>
>>>of course it works, and you just invite the next follow up cheapo ;-)
>>>
>>>2000 years ago the romans were perhaps not aware that there was much more to the
>>>world than rome. sometimes one gets the feeling that the US citizens are no
>>>different in this respect...
>>
>>
>>Ok, how about holding a world chess championship that only inconviences
>>Russians.
>>
>>I think you get the idea.  :)
>>
>>MH
>
>of course i get the idea! i put a disclaimer on my first post stating clearly
>that IMO the championship should be held in the US from time to time, and i
>labelled my posts as cheapos :-)
>i thought that made it clear enough...
>
>going back to your comparison with the russians: exactly how many american
>programs are in the top 10 of the SSDF list?


The SSDF list only uses consumer-grade technology to test programs.  Programs
tuned to that limited technology will always top that list.  That is why the
list is of limited importance.  A real WCCC is going to attract high performance
projects, not just consumer oriented projects.  This is what the New World has
always offered.  But, Old Worlders have a problem with that I guess.

There, that's my cheapo.  ;-)

MH



>hint: less than russians in the top
>10 of the FIDE list!
>
>cheers
>  martin



This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.