Author: Anthony Cozzie
Date: 09:16:52 11/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 2003 at 14:44:23, Tord Romstad wrote: >On November 18, 2003 at 11:39:20, Bas Hamstra wrote: > >>On November 18, 2003 at 10:51:44, Tony Werten wrote: >> >>>Couldn't resist. >>> >>>Tony >> >>Actually, in Leiden you said SEE costs you only a table lookup. My question is: >>what about x-rays? It seems impossible to me to get the *real* see value with a >>table lookup in practice. So how do you do it? > >In the same way as Rebel, I guess (see Ed's page for details). If you just >include x-ray attacks in your attack tables, it is fairly straightforward. >It is not always 100% accurate, but in practise it works very well. I do >something very similar myself. > >What I would really like to know is how to do this without really big lookup >tables. I will probably try porting my engine to PalmOS some time soon, >and a lookup table of several hundred KBs will obviously not work well >there. Because Rebel used to run on slow dedicated chess computers with >limited memory in the past, I guess there must be a way. > >Ed, are you listening? :-) > >Tord Zappa uses tables; they are 32KB in size. What on earth are you doing that makes it several hundred KB? anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.