Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: No - it is not the charta. it is us.

Author: James B. Shearer

Date: 22:55:12 11/13/98

Go up one level in this thread


On November 13, 1998 at 16:24:14, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>when somebody calls me a liar, and his post is not deleted,
>and i am thrown out because i said that somebodys profession stamps for the
>private life (if you are a priest or a teacher e.g.), or i shall post with a
>disclaimer meanwhile the moderator has to have 3 disclaimers himself...
>there is something NOT IN BALANCE.

     Regarding disclaimers, there are at least two reasons for disclaimers.
  1. To warn the reader that you have a financial or other interest which might
affect your ability to write objectively on a subject.
  2. To make it clear you are speaking for yourself and not for some other
person or organization which the reader might otherwise suppose you are
representing.
      You were asked to use a disclaimer for reason 2. so suggesting that others
should have a disclaimer for reason 1. is just confusing things.
      Nevertheless I think you had a point that most readers know you are not
speaking for Ed and so there is no strong reason to tell them particularly
absent a complaint.  One could as well request Hyatt post a disclaimer that he
is not speaking for IBM when defending Deep Blue.
                            James B. Shearer



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.