Author: Rex
Date: 05:04:46 11/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
Mig, As human ver computers are an interesting match to watch, there needs to be the "next step" of matches to occur. Would Gary be interested playing among a group of people all in the top 5 or 10 in the world plus included in this tournement the top 3 to 5 top Chess Programs. So we would have the TOP 4 GM's or so, VER the TOP 4 Computer Chess Programs all in a Tournement. This would surely get some exiting play and sponcers. On November 21, 2003 at 03:26:41, Mig Greengard wrote: >Had a long, fascinating session with Garry on Wednesday. He went over all the >games and talked deep and wide about computer chess and his matches. It was all >video-recorded for future display as a Playchess.com multimedia segment. Some of >it is recapped in the article I just put up here: > >http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1313 > >More will go up in text later. From a chess perspective my suspicions during the >game were confirmed when he said that he had analyzed just about all of game >four a few years ago when looking at that QGA line. He mostly spent his time >double-checking things to see if the Fritz team had found something nasty >somewhere. That one of his former analysts, Kharlov, had played that game up to >move 18 in 2001 was a tip-off. The position was already equal by that point. > >Probably of more interest to you all is Kasparov's interest in computer-computer >games beyond simply preparing for a specific opponent. That part I recap in the >article linked to above. I'm seeing him again before he leaves Sunday so if you >have an interesting, (non-flame) question for him on comp chess I'll be happy to >put it to him (and take credit for it myself of course).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.