Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: new hash table article by steve lopez

Author: William Penn

Date: 08:45:30 11/22/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 22, 2003 at 03:48:22, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On November 22, 2003 at 03:36:48, Angrim wrote:
>
>>How Bizzare.
>>The only reason I can see for wanting a lower limit for blitz than for slower
>>speeds is if the engine had to clear its hash table before each move.
>>Do *any* engines do that?
>
>I doubt any of the new ones do. At least he got the basic advice right,
>but it still doesnt seem to have totally sunk in.
>
>--
>GCP

How about power of 2's? Is that also now completely obsolete? For example, is
512MB hash better than 640MB hash?
WP



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.