Author: blass uri
Date: 01:00:10 11/15/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 15, 1998 at 02:45:54, Ed Schröder wrote: >>Posted by Thorsten Czub on November 14, 1998 at 19:07:55: > >>>>Others (who have also bought junior5) have found out the same. > >>fact, these persons have posted here. > >>>>Ed claimed the same very early. > >>fact too. ed said that the fritz5 autoplayer stops rebel from learning, posted >>in old discussions months ago. >>i have not said that you claimed something about the junior autoplayer ed. >>i said you claimed the same, meaning you said that rebels learning was not >>working in your observation months before. but anybody oversaw this. > > >>>I claimed nothing. Junior5 even hasn't been installed on my autoplayers >>>so I can't know. > >>i have not said you claimed about junior. junior is only an engine in the fritz5 >>user interface. what happens to junior might have also happened to the secret >>chessbase fritz5 autoplayer. and you proofed this autoplayer, or ? >>you had a log-file of the data send from ONE to Other machine, or ? >>And there was nothing in the data. all clean. only that rebel was unable to >>learn. or ? I remember that this was said months ago. > > >You have your facts completely wrong Thorsten. > >Let me summarize.... > >#1. There were 3 people who had the F5 autoplayer (F5A) and they >sometimes passed information about the thing here in CCC. > >#2. One of them said: "F5A does not save opponent games". > >#3. I then reacted: > >a) This is horrible, it might influence the learner of opponents programs. >I was talking about ALL programs. The games of the ssdf list are public so I think that if it influence the learner of opponent programs then it can be proved. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.