Author: margolies,marc
Date: 10:51:04 11/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Jeroen! I do not believe I am ignorant, but thank you for pointing it out. Since I was responding to his post and not his reviews content--I think that I read enough to do that. Had I responded to his reviews content first, I would be in effect legitimating a post which in form is an egregious sales pitch--although only selling his review for free apparently. But should I be predisposed to do that? I was not ignorant of the Post to which I was responding. And my charges were not criminal- so I am not sure why you set a higher standard for my post than for Kantack's post-- or your own for that matter if you wish to discuss my presumed personal failings. Mr. Kantack could easily write a more acceptable post to promote his reviews if that is what they are. No one attempted to ban him. And if you want to read spam at CCC that is your choice, too. On November 23, 2003 at 11:39:05, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: >On November 23, 2003 at 01:58:28, margolies,marc wrote: > >>thanks, Mr. Wold. I can read fine. When I see "christmas" and suggested prices >>in links, do I have to delve into the minutiae of trash? > >Yes, you should. > >As soon as you see "christmas", and see suggested prices in links, and before >start to write "moderation: spamming", you should have to delve into the >minutiae to see if it's trash or not. > >Are you really serious in stating that you can shout anything without knowing >what's really going on, and defend yourself with ignorance? > >J.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.