Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 03:57:03 11/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 2003 at 05:07:27, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On November 24, 2003 at 04:57:36, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >[snip] > >>>Of course Diep has the best hardware, but the combination doesn't match the best >>>of Fritz, Shredder or even Brutus. But at least all the chessbase programs >>>including Shredder should have the same hardware as Fritz and Junior. >>> >>>Jorge >> >>I agree with you and I was told it would have been so, but maybe CB prefers to >>favor some program over some others...isn't? >> >>Still I am confident... >> >>Sandro Hi, > >I'm wondering about the engines which are sold by CB: who submits the attendance >in WCCC2003 for these engines? The programmers or CB? If the submitters are the >programmers, I would assume the hardware used is also in their responsibility. >In this case, I don't see a problem. (although it would be fairer IMHO if they >all used the same hardware, since - unlike Brutus or Diep - none of them did >more than make their engine SMP) > >Sargon I only know that Shredder can use up to 8 processors if such hardware would have been available. I believe these servers with 4 processors a lended to Cb by sponsors, so why not to Shredder too? We will win anyway regardless of everything!! Ciao Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.