Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:14:17 11/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 2003 at 01:40:05, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >On November 24, 2003 at 01:37:11, martin fierz wrote: > >>On November 23, 2003 at 20:21:36, Richard Sutherland wrote: >> >>>On November 23, 2003 at 20:08:53, Russell Reagan wrote: >>> >>>>On November 23, 2003 at 14:51:06, Richard Sutherland wrote: >>>> >>>>>This message board is very difficult to follow >> >>[snip] >> >>i find this board MUCH easier to follow than those php boards. the big advantage >>of this format is that you get all messages at one glance. the php boards i know >>give you all threads at one glance, but IMO that is far worse: >>as it is now, i immediately see who has posted on what, so i know whether i want >>to read that post. >>in the php-style boards, i don't see all posts - e.g. i see a post from someone >>i know i don't want to read his post, but i don't see that there is an answer >>from someone whose posts i usually read... >> >>this is not just resistance to something new. i've used php boards and i don't >>like them. >> >>cheers >> martin > >I strongly prefer current format, too. > >Thanks, >Eugene I much prefer usenet news approach. More convenient. Supports threads also. But also supports offline reading/posting, and allows downloading new posts whenever it is convenient, not right when you click to read...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.