Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 15:42:35 11/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 2003 at 18:37:26, Dann Corbit wrote: >On November 24, 2003 at 18:32:43, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On November 24, 2003 at 18:11:49, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On November 24, 2003 at 17:55:10, James T. Walker wrote: >>> >>>>On November 24, 2003 at 17:42:59, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>I have just released the source for version 19.6. It has two changes >>>>>of interest: >>>>> >>>>>1. The compile problems for windows are gone. It should compile cleanly >>>>>for SMP and non-SMP versions, as is. >>>>> >>>>>2. Eugene has modified the egtb probe code to reduce the decompression >>>>>indices memory requirement by nearly 50%. For the tables I use, the old >>>>>version needed 177mb, the new version needs 100mb. The new version is also >>>>>a couple of percent faster due to another tweak we tried... >>>> >>>>To where did you release it? Why are there no more ".exe" versions of Crafty at >>>>the FTP site? Since I can't compile it myself I'm out in the cold. I hate >>>>modified versions of a program without having the original to compare it to. >>> >>>I'll put up a binary in a few minutes. >> >>Hi Dan, >> >>When I try to compile _any_ version of Crafty with MSVC++ 6.0 w/sp5, for some >>reason when it plays I can not get over 95% cpu. Your version has no problems. >> >>I use the default makefile, and the commandline nmake wcraftyx -f makefile.nt >> >>Is there something I am doing wrong? > >Don't know. I use my own build scripts. > >>Should I install the processor pack from Intel? I would but I have no clue where >>to get it anymore. > >I had it installed when I was using VC++ 6.0. I use MS VC++.NET 2003 now. I was thinking of purchasing the newer version. Do you know if the default makefile for would work with it without modification?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.