Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 19:38:35 11/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 2003 at 19:59:48, george wrote: >i have Pocket fritz 2 and it beats me all the time ...i am a bad player >though...in any case my question is this. > >my pocket fritz analyses not more then 5000 p/sec i have it overclocked and it >runs on 400@472 ..its an ipaq 3900 >i am reading tho that chess genius on a same hardware or processor can make it >up to 100000 p/sec....so does pocket fritz has any change agaist this version..i >am talking about chess genius 1.5 > >so CG is around 20 times faster PF...so my question is...how much better is CG >..and have people allready made some test agaist then?? > >thangs for any answer PF2 gives PCG a game. I am still undecided about which is stronger. I get alittle more nps out of Fritz 2 than 5K. 15K is my low end and it goes to 25K+nps. Overclocking I see 40K nps on my Dell Axim. PF2 has a better book and also has learning. But for tactics, PCG is faster in most positions , but not all on my machine. I prefer to play PCG - can't really put a finger on it , except to say that is my preference. Both engines can beat me up easily, although Genius can get it trouble when it plays c6 to my e4. I take it right into the blackmar-diemar gambit and can win just about every time from instant to 10"/game. Of course that is what makes it fun for me :>). My shortest win is a 20 mover at 3 seconds per move.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.