Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:03:48 11/25/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 25, 2003 at 06:54:52, Ricardo R Santana wrote: >Hello > >On November 25, 2003 at 06:32:19, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote: > >>there is one "little" flaw in your "argument". >>Chessbase is the main sponsor of Brutus development since Oktober 2000. >> >No problem about this. The question is that, when fritz wins against any other >program, you do not see they "explaining" that fritz had a much better >hardware....did you ? > >>Apart from that Chessbase is pretty obviously not trying to explain a defeat, >>they are just giving some information about Brutus. >> > >I do not believe this. if so, why, when chessbase programs got first on ssdf >using better hardware, we did not see these "explanations".. ?? > >>But do not quail, my friend. You are in good company here on CCC. Very few seem >>to check the facts before making accusations, insults, or statements here. >> >>Georg >> > >chessbase could be brutus sponsor, but it´s really nice to see a program beating >the chessbase child (Fritz) !!!! So, at least, people will agree fritz is not >the best (was it?) > >Go brutus !!!! Shredder is the leader of the ssdf and not Fritz. Why do you expect people to think that Fritz is the best? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.