Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 04:46:12 11/25/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 25, 2003 at 07:02:56, Ricardo R Santana wrote: >hello > >let me post another "explanation" from chessbase (round 1) > >"The second game to end was that of Fritz. Fresh from it's match against Garry >Kasparov in New York the Dutch-German program played a great positional game, >leaving opponent Falcon no chance. Peter Wells was very impressed by Fritz's >exchange of the Bb2 for its counterpart on g7. "That shows great positional >understanding," the English GM said." Position after 17...Ng4: [D] 2bqr1k1/5pbp/p2p2p1/n1pP4/4P1n1/6P1/PBQN1PBP/1N3RK1 w - - 0 18 That comment was ridiculous. What move should white play other than 18.Bxg7 ? Falcon decided to exchange black squared bishops by playing Ng4, not Fritz. > >so, where is the explanation telling that falcon was running in Intel Pentium IV >2.4 GHz and Fritz was running in a Quad Intel Pentium IV 2.8 Ghz ????????? > >where ?? where ?? Of course Falcon had no chance, it was in a worst >hardware...but I see no "explanation" about this...but when fritz was defeat (GO >brutus !!) , what do you see ??? > > >so, tell me now ... what do you believe ? I believe you can not expect chessbase.com to be independent. Have you ever heared about a company that does not praise their own products? Michael > >See you >Ricardo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.