Author: Albert Silver
Date: 08:28:48 11/25/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 25, 2003 at 07:03:48, Uri Blass wrote:
>On November 25, 2003 at 06:54:52, Ricardo R Santana wrote:
>
>>Hello
>>
>>On November 25, 2003 at 06:32:19, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote:
>>
>>>there is one "little" flaw in your "argument".
>>>Chessbase is the main sponsor of Brutus development since Oktober 2000.
>>>
>>No problem about this. The question is that, when fritz wins against any other
>>program, you do not see they "explaining" that fritz had a much better
>>hardware....did you ?
>>
>>>Apart from that Chessbase is pretty obviously not trying to explain a defeat,
>>>they are just giving some information about Brutus.
>>>
>>
>>I do not believe this. if so, why, when chessbase programs got first on ssdf
>>using better hardware, we did not see these "explanations".. ??
>>
>>>But do not quail, my friend. You are in good company here on CCC. Very few seem
>>>to check the facts before making accusations, insults, or statements here.
>>>
>>>Georg
>>>
>>
>>chessbase could be brutus sponsor, but it´s really nice to see a program beating
>>the chessbase child (Fritz) !!!! So, at least, people will agree fritz is not
>>the best (was it?)
>>
>>Go brutus !!!!
>
>Shredder is the leader of the ssdf and not Fritz.
>Why do you expect people to think that Fritz is the best?
>
>Uri
Possibly because it is most highlighted (like the latest match) and Chessbase is
always promoting it more than other programs. Things like the SSDF are not
followed by typical users, so they read what the back of the box says. Didn't
Friedel, thus Chessbase, recently decalre the latest version of Fritz to be the
strongest program in the world?
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.