Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 09:12:32 11/25/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 25, 2003 at 12:05:39, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >On November 25, 2003 at 11:23:25, Bob Durrett wrote: > >>On November 25, 2003 at 11:01:34, Jonas Bylund wrote: >> >>>[Event "ICS Unrated Standard match"] >>>[Site "chessclub.com"] >>>[Date "2002.04.16"] >>>[Round "-"] >>>[White "*Shredder(C)"] >>>[Black "*Brutus(C)"] >>>[Result "*"] >>>[WhiteElo "0"] >>>[BlackElo "0"] >>>[TimeControl "7200"] >>> >>>1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bg5 e6 7. f4 Qb6 8. >>>Nb3 Be7 9. Qf3 Nbd7 10. O-O-O Qc7 11. Kb1 b5 12. Bd3 Bb7 13. a3 O-O-O??? 14. >>>Qe2 Kb8 15. Rhf1 h6 16. Bh4 g5 17. Be1 gxf4 18. Rxf4 Rdg8 19. Bh4 Rg6 20. >>>Rdf1 e5 21. Rf5 Rc8 22. g4 Bd8 23. g5 hxg5 24. Bxg5 Be7 25. h4 Qd8 >>>* >>> >>>Regards >>>Jonas >> >>If true, then it is a sad state of affairs. All the wonderful brilliant >>programming and the most fantastic hardware in the World won't help a bit if the >>game is lost while still in the Opening book. >> >>Bob D. > >Hello, > >do you _really_ believe that Brutus is a better chess program than Shredder? If >you do, you are very much mistaken. It is not only a matter of opening but of >playing the game of chess and making one's program "understand" things. That is >exactly where Brutus and Shredder differ. Just my opinion, of course. Yes, and my opinion too. A good position after the opening means much, but if the engine is not able to convert the (theoretical) advantage to a win, then a good opening is worthless. I believe that Shredder is much more powerfull than Brutus right now. > >BTW, do not forget that Shredder 7.04 on a meagre K6-400 is over 2600 on the >SSDF list... > >Djordje
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.