Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 14:27:27 11/25/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 25, 2003 at 16:45:29, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 25, 2003 at 15:18:37, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On November 25, 2003 at 15:00:35, Joachim Rang wrote: >> >>>On November 25, 2003 at 14:28:55, Drexel,Michael wrote: >>> >>>>On November 25, 2003 at 14:03:45, Joachim Rang wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 25, 2003 at 13:58:51, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Standing after round 5: >>>>>> >>>>>>WCCC 2003 >>>>>> >>>>>>1 Brutus 4.0/5 >>>>>>2 Shredder 4.0/5 >>>>>>3 Quest 3.5/5 >>>>>>4 Deep Junior 3.5/5 >>>>>>5 Diep 3.0/5 >>>>>>6 Green Light 3.0/5 >>>>>>7 Falcon 2.5/5 >>>>>>8 List 3.0/5 >>>>>>9 Deep Sjeng 2.5/5 >>>>>>10 Jonny 2.5/5 >>>>>>11 Chinito 2.0/5 >>>>>>12 Quark 2.0/5 >>>>>>13 ParSOS 1.5/5 >>>>>>14 Ruy Lopez 1.0/5 >>>>>>15 Nexus 1.0/5 >>>>>>16 Hossa 1.0/5 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Junior has to play against Shredder AND Brutus. >>>> >>>>>Quest already played all >>>>favorites. >>>> >>>>Are Deep Junior and Diep not favorites? >>>> >>>>Michael >>>> >>>>>It is _very_ interesting I do not dare to predict something. >>>>> >>>>>regards Joachim >>> >>> >>>Deep Junior is of course a favorite, therefor I mentioned, that it has yet to >>>play against Shredder and Brutus. >> >>...and Quest :) >> >>> >>>Despite the 500 proc diep is for me not a favorite and therefore I didn't >>>include it in the fantastic 4. >> >>A thing on 500 processors can beat any program. (, with better opening lines ;) >>) >> >>Port Crafty to that supercomputer and it might beat the hell out of Quest >>on 4*2.8 Ghz in a long match. > >I am surprised that you expect Crafty on a super computer to beat Quest on >4*2.8Ghz. > >You predicted that Crafty with 10 times faster hardware is going to lose against >Junior when the programs use their books and the hardware of Junior is clearly >slower than 4x2.8 GHz. Crafty on 512 500MHz processors is much more than 10 times faster than Crafty on 4x2.8 GHz. Michael >faster hardware should help Junior because faster hardware usually help the >better program. > >Note also that even if you are correct then you still forget that all the >evidence that I know tells me that Diep is significantly weaker than Crafty on >equal hardware. > >Based on knowing Vincent I am not going to be surprised if he implemented a lot >of counter productive knowledge in Diep. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.