Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: WCCC 2003 (Standing after round 5)

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 14:47:33 11/25/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 25, 2003 at 17:27:27, Drexel,Michael wrote:

>On November 25, 2003 at 16:45:29, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On November 25, 2003 at 15:18:37, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>>
>>>On November 25, 2003 at 15:00:35, Joachim Rang wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 25, 2003 at 14:28:55, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On November 25, 2003 at 14:03:45, Joachim Rang wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On November 25, 2003 at 13:58:51, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Standing after round 5:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>WCCC  2003
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>1   Brutus              4.0/5
>>>>>>>2   Shredder            4.0/5
>>>>>>>3   Quest               3.5/5
>>>>>>>4   Deep Junior         3.5/5
>>>>>>>5   Diep                3.0/5
>>>>>>>6   Green Light         3.0/5
>>>>>>>7   Falcon              2.5/5
>>>>>>>8   List                3.0/5
>>>>>>>9   Deep Sjeng          2.5/5
>>>>>>>10  Jonny               2.5/5
>>>>>>>11  Chinito             2.0/5
>>>>>>>12  Quark               2.0/5
>>>>>>>13  ParSOS              1.5/5
>>>>>>>14  Ruy Lopez           1.0/5
>>>>>>>15  Nexus               1.0/5
>>>>>>>16  Hossa               1.0/5
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Junior has to play against Shredder AND Brutus.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Quest already played all
>>>>>favorites.
>>>>>
>>>>>Are Deep Junior and Diep not favorites?
>>>>>
>>>>>Michael
>>>>>
>>>>>>It is _very_ interesting I do not dare to predict something.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>regards Joachim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Deep Junior is of course a favorite, therefor I mentioned, that it has yet to
>>>>play against Shredder and Brutus.
>>>
>>>...and Quest :)
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Despite the 500 proc diep is for me not a favorite and therefore I didn't
>>>>include it in the fantastic 4.
>>>
>>>A thing on 500 processors can beat any program. (, with better opening lines ;)
>>>)
>>>
>>>Port Crafty to that supercomputer and it might beat the hell out of Quest
>>>on 4*2.8 Ghz in a long match.
>>
>>I am surprised that you expect Crafty on a super computer to beat Quest on
>>4*2.8Ghz.
>>
>>You predicted that Crafty with 10 times faster hardware is going to lose against
>>Junior when the programs use their books and the hardware of Junior is clearly
>>slower than 4x2.8 GHz.
>
>Crafty on 512 500MHz processors is much more than 10 times faster than Crafty on
>4x2.8 GHz.
>
>Michael

I am not sure about it.

I do not know the speed improvement from 512 processors and it may be only 100
times faster than one 500 Mhz processor when 4*2.8 Ghz is more than 10 times
faster than one processor of 500 Mhz.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.