Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hash in quiescent search

Author: macaroni

Date: 19:34:27 11/25/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 25, 2003 at 22:32:20, Joel wrote:

>Different people get different results with this one. Depends on a lot of
>factors, I suggest to just try it out!
>
>I use a seperate, smallish QSearch hastable, but the benefits are minimal due to
>my SEE capture ordering. It used to work a little better when I used MVA/LVA.
>
>Joel

do you use your qsearch hash for main search move ordering at all? or are there
no where near enough hits to justify it?




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.