Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: WCCC 2003 (Standing after round 5)

Author: Drexel,Michael

Date: 23:41:51 11/25/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 25, 2003 at 17:47:33, Uri Blass wrote:

>On November 25, 2003 at 17:27:27, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>
>>On November 25, 2003 at 16:45:29, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On November 25, 2003 at 15:18:37, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 25, 2003 at 15:00:35, Joachim Rang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On November 25, 2003 at 14:28:55, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On November 25, 2003 at 14:03:45, Joachim Rang wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On November 25, 2003 at 13:58:51, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Standing after round 5:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>WCCC  2003
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>1   Brutus              4.0/5
>>>>>>>>2   Shredder            4.0/5
>>>>>>>>3   Quest               3.5/5
>>>>>>>>4   Deep Junior         3.5/5
>>>>>>>>5   Diep                3.0/5
>>>>>>>>6   Green Light         3.0/5
>>>>>>>>7   Falcon              2.5/5
>>>>>>>>8   List                3.0/5
>>>>>>>>9   Deep Sjeng          2.5/5
>>>>>>>>10  Jonny               2.5/5
>>>>>>>>11  Chinito             2.0/5
>>>>>>>>12  Quark               2.0/5
>>>>>>>>13  ParSOS              1.5/5
>>>>>>>>14  Ruy Lopez           1.0/5
>>>>>>>>15  Nexus               1.0/5
>>>>>>>>16  Hossa               1.0/5
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Junior has to play against Shredder AND Brutus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Quest already played all
>>>>>>favorites.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Are Deep Junior and Diep not favorites?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Michael
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It is _very_ interesting I do not dare to predict something.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>regards Joachim
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Deep Junior is of course a favorite, therefor I mentioned, that it has yet to
>>>>>play against Shredder and Brutus.
>>>>
>>>>...and Quest :)
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Despite the 500 proc diep is for me not a favorite and therefore I didn't
>>>>>include it in the fantastic 4.
>>>>
>>>>A thing on 500 processors can beat any program. (, with better opening lines ;)
>>>>)
>>>>
>>>>Port Crafty to that supercomputer and it might beat the hell out of Quest
>>>>on 4*2.8 Ghz in a long match.
>>>
>>>I am surprised that you expect Crafty on a super computer to beat Quest on
>>>4*2.8Ghz.
>>>
>>>You predicted that Crafty with 10 times faster hardware is going to lose against
>>>Junior when the programs use their books and the hardware of Junior is clearly
>>>slower than 4x2.8 GHz.
>>
>>Crafty on 512 500MHz processors is much more than 10 times faster than Crafty on
>>4x2.8 GHz.
>>
>>Michael
>
>I am not sure about it.
>
>I do not know the speed improvement from 512 processors and it may be only 100
>times faster than one 500 Mhz processor when 4*2.8 Ghz is more than 10 times
>faster than one processor of 500 Mhz.
>
>Uri

I read Vincent claims that Diep in Graz is up to 75 times faster than Diep on
AMD 1800.

Michael



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.