Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hash in quiescent search

Author: Steffen Jakob

Date: 00:26:05 11/26/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 25, 2003 at 22:32:20, Joel wrote:

>Different people get different results with this one. Depends on a lot of
>factors, I suggest to just try it out!
>
>I use a seperate, smallish QSearch hastable, but the benefits are minimal due to
>my SEE capture ordering. It used to work a little better when I used MVA/LVA.

I do the same. I also have a separate table because I dont want to mix it with
the normal hash table. Using a qsearch hash table is slightly better for Hossa
but the advantage for me is minimal.

Greetings,
Steffen.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.