Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 09:53:21 11/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 26, 2003 at 09:47:08, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 26, 2003 at 08:28:50, George Tsavdaris wrote: > >>Computers play in closed position, is amazingly silly. >>Look this unfinished game between Sjeng and Jonny for WCCC03. >>Luckily when the position was opened, the game became interesting... > >You do not understand. > > >Sjeng has no way to win directly so it waits for the opponent to push a pawn >and create weaknesses. You have to be kidding about the words: "it waits". It doesn't understand many things from the position. It only understands that if it moves it's pawns then it's position would become worse. Yes this is something, but it's far from handling the position in an right way. If it understood the position then it would offer a draw, as it would knew there is no way to win and even if it believed there is a win, then why it played such silly moves. A human GM would laugh with both computers moves. But to say :it waits" is wrong and it's the same like saying that it plays fast it's moves, because it knows it's opponent is in time problem. Computers can't plan or think about any situation different from the evaluation of variations. > >Nothing silly from Sjeng's side. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.