Author: ALI MIRAFZALI
Date: 02:36:41 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2003 at 04:56:59, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On November 27, 2003 at 04:36:20, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: > >>On November 27, 2003 at 03:06:02, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On November 27, 2003 at 02:59:36, Gerald Wright wrote: >>> >>>>The Top players in the computer chess championship are all capable of drawing or >>>>winning a match vs Kasparov or them in the top 10. >>> >>> As long as 2200 ELO players can get a lot of draws >>> with safe and boring playing style the best comp >>> programs do not have more than 2400 Elo. >>> Kurt >>What you are saying Kurt does not make sense at all.A 2400 elo player could >>not draw Kasaprov under any circumstances.Please check the definition of ELO. >>Also your claim of 2200 Elo players getting draws is Contrary to my own private >>testing of many many games against 2200 Elo players. > > I also think he is wrong about the 2400 ELO, but did the players you saw, >played with the safe and boring style Kurt suggested? I think if they were, then >the games will have many draws. > Kurt recently wrote some rules, about how humans must play against computers. I >think if all GM's followed that rules, then computers would have more problems. > The ELO of the computers is a very complicated subject and here is a very >good artivle about: >http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1146 Yes they did in fact play safe.Unfortunately the realities of Computer chess are not in tune with What fans of Human Chess want.Also note that recent matches have been between the very Top GMS (Kasparov ;Kramnik)and Computers. Put a 2500 Elo GM and he will lose the Match.The Rules of Kurt looks nice only on Paper ;and the realities of actual play are rather different.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.