Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The newer Fritz is as strong Strategically as it is tactically !

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 02:47:08 11/27/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 27, 2003 at 04:57:48, martin fierz wrote:

>On November 26, 2003 at 20:52:16, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1325
>[snip]
>
>>Question: After round seven you and Shredder are in the lead, and it looks like
>>one of you will take the title. What do you say about Fritz's performance, which
>>will its strategy be during the rest of the tournament?
>>
>>Morsch: In the past years we have always tried to beat the amateur programs with
>>tactical means. But this has become too dangerous, because you have to take a
>>lot of risks. That has cost us a number of points in the past. The latest
>>version of Fritz plays excellent positional chess, as you were able to see for
>>instance in its game against Shredder. That is our strength.
>>
>>Question: Is the dramatic improvement in strategic play a result of the
>>preparation for the match against Garry Kasparov?
>>
>>Morsch: That is correct. I spent a lot of time and effort making Fritz
>>strategically as strong as it is in the tactical area. I am convinced that only
>>by improving the positional understanding of the program that its performance
>>can be further improved. I am very gratified that this seems to be working not
>>just against human player but also against other programs.
>
>
>well, what an interview!
>no mention of the pathetic performance of fritz in game 3 vs kasparov which was
>a positional disaster. and it seems like at least some other engines would have
>played that position much better (results were posted here which seem to
>indicate that some other engines would have moved their f-pawn...).
>but of course, what can you expect when you look at the chessbase website?
>
>also, that fritz plays excellent positional chess "as you can see in the game
>vs. shredder" seems pretty weird; wasn't that basically just a book loss?
>
>cheers
>  martin

I do not think that it was a book loss.

Fritz got better position after book but there was no tactical win and I am not
sure if Fritz could win against 4 processors of shredder.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.