Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is it safe to say then that Computers today play 2800 level chess?

Author: stuart taylor

Date: 07:05:29 11/27/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 27, 2003 at 09:13:59, Bob Durrett wrote:

>On November 27, 2003 at 08:21:05, stuart taylor wrote:
>
>>On November 27, 2003 at 08:13:15, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On November 27, 2003 at 08:06:06, stuart taylor wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 27, 2003 at 03:03:07, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On November 27, 2003 at 02:59:36, Gerald Wright wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>The Top players in the computer chess championship are all capable of drawing or
>>>>>>winning a match vs Kasparov or them in the top 10.
>>>>>
>>>>>It is very safe to say that computer today play 2800 level chess because people
>>>>>will never prove you wrong because they are not going to play enough games.
>>>>>
>>>>>Uri
>>>>
>>>>So what do you conclude from the low rated players you sometimes wrote about who
>>>>beat programs like Fritz 6? (or 7?)
>>>>Didn't that mean that if you study anti-computer chess properly, then the
>>>>computers are much easier to beat? (and should be rated much much less?)
>>>>
>>>>[not PROOF, but very strong indication that they are far from 2800)
>>>>
>>>>S.Taylor
>>>
>>>It was only Fritz6 on slower hardware
>>>
>>>I cannot get conclusions from it about the programs of today that are clearly
>>>better both in hardware and in software.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>Shouldn't all that add 200 elo at the most?
>>S.Taylor
>
>Really, that is just a rule of thumb, such as "you should develop your knights
>before bishops in the opening."  If you believe the Fritz guys, Fritz is being
>changed so that it will do better at positional chess and in chess against
>humans.  If they are successful, then they will be plugging a few holes in the
>Fritz vs Human games.  Maybe the anti-computer strategies of the past will not
>be as successful in the future.  It would be interesting to see if any
>"low-rated" humans can still whip Fritz by anti-computer strategies.  The same
>applies for all the rest of the front-runner chess engines.
>
>Bob D.

Therefore, even if computers were about 2200, they quickly become 2800 simply by
becoming less vulnerable to anti-computer play?
S.Taylor



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.