Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 08:42:25 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2003 at 11:12:03, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On November 27, 2003 at 08:47:48, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On November 27, 2003 at 08:44:59, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >> >>>On November 27, 2003 at 05:45:32, ludicrous wrote: >>> >>>>To me it looks like this: >>>> >>>>Comps play 2800 level - yes - under certain circumstances. Give them wide open >>>>positions - they play like a 2800 player. Let them play in a Category 12-14 >>>>tournament - and they walk away win the first prize. >>>> >>>>They are like Supermen with a weakness (kryptonite, which is Anti Computer >>>>Chess). Let them play special players like Mr Nemeth, and these comps show some >>>>stupidity. >>> >>>Mr. Nemeth is playing with a quite slow machine and not a tournament timings, >>>and he only publish his victories...not his defeats neither draws against the >>>machine. >>> >>>> >>>>I agree partially with the previous post - I can't really consider comps an >>>>ideally solid 2800 elo rated player if they can be consistently beaten (ask >>>>eduard nementh) or halted to a draw. Can Kasparov be constantly beaten by >>>>someone whose rating is much lower than his? >>> >>>They can't be consistently beaten, since it's very hard to steer in a closed pos >>>and win. Only occasionally you can get the win (the best you can hope is a >>>draw), but you have to be Kasparov to do that nowadays. >>> >>>w.b.r. >>>Otello >> >>I'm sorry that's not true, as if it were I wouldn't have any wins to my credit. >> >>Terry > >If you think to be able to beat the comps consistently and sistematically you >should candidate yourself for the next match man - machine :) > >w.b.r. >Otello Nice idea, but my name isn't Kasparov or Kramnik;-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.