Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Crafty Clone was disqualified, what a shame

Author: Slater Wold

Date: 12:52:26 11/27/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 27, 2003 at 15:51:25, Uri Blass wrote:

>On November 27, 2003 at 15:41:22, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On November 27, 2003 at 15:17:51, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1330
>>
>>I am very surprised to read it.
>>
>>I remember that I read that Dann Corbit looked at the source code of an older
>>version and found it original so I never suspected that it is derived from
>>Crafty.
>>
>>I also remember that Dann Corbit claimed that he usually have good ideas for
>>programs that he looks at their source code but not in that case.
>>
>>Uri
>
>I can add that as far as I remember List4.60 or 4.61 is one of the
>older versions that Dann corbit was impressed by it when he saw the source code
>so I really do not understand it.
>
>Is it possible that Dann did not pay attention to the fact that a program is a
>Crafty clone?
>
>
>Uri

If it was a clone, Dann of all people would have noticed.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.