Author: Djordje Vidanovic
Date: 14:48:14 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2003 at 17:42:58, margolies,marc wrote: >These are not charges based upon LIST's <<performance>> in a direct >way--Although all of LIST's defenders offer counter-proof regarding different >performance characteristics between Crafty and LIST. >The charge is PLAGIARISM-- lifting of (some)code. The Programmer in question has >not responded to the commitee's request for proof with a defense (according to >Levy's Report--I have no direct knowledge) therefore the Commitee had to act to >protect the legitimacy of the Tournament. Also the commitee's action were a >response to a complaint by an (unnamed) tournament participant who has standing >to do so. I think that by banning List they've just hurt the legitimacy of the tournament very badly. Djordje
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.