Author: José Carlos
Date: 15:26:14 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2003 at 18:17:58, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >On November 27, 2003 at 18:13:30, José Carlos wrote: > >>On November 27, 2003 at 18:09:15, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >> >>>On November 27, 2003 at 17:54:57, Andrew Williams wrote: >>> >>>>On November 27, 2003 at 17:45:59, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 27, 2003 at 16:04:19, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 27, 2003 at 15:51:52, Slater Wold wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On November 27, 2003 at 15:40:59, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On November 27, 2003 at 15:38:44, Volker Pittlik wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On November 27, 2003 at 15:17:51, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1330 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Does anybody know something about the "...circumstantial evidence given to the >>>>>>>>>Tournament Committee by the complainant..." ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Volker >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Would be interesting to know who is: >>>>>>>>"one of the participants concerning his suspicion that the program LIST, entered >>>>>>>>by Fritz Reul, is based on the program CRAFTY" ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>regards >>>>>>>>Andy >>>>>>> >>>>>>>$20 says it was Vince. >>>>>> >>>>>>He also suspects that Ruffian is a Shredder clone: it's just Paranoia. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>The man is actually harmful (schaedlich)... He is generally treated with only a >>>>>passing glance and all his whims and insults are viewed in a somewhat jocular >>>>>manner. But he is a walking disaster. He reported on Ruffian before the Leiden >>>>>tourney and it took Per-Ola a couple of hours to explain to Theo van der Storm >>>>>all the innards of Ruffian. I've had just about enough of him and his being >>>>>treated as a charming enfant terrible whose tantrums should be tolerated. I >>>>>really feel bad about this one: I can only imagine how Fritz R. is feeling >>>>>now... He might even be thinking about quitting chess programming altogether... >>>>> >>>>>Djordje >>>> >>>>I don't think there is any evidence that Vincent is to blame for the accusation. >>>> >>>>Andrew >>> >>>There is no evidence because Vincent is not involved. >>> >>>Arturo Ochoa, Responsible of the Diep Book. >> >> Hi Arturo, >> Do you know who issued the complaint? And if so, do you have any information >>about the evidence he provided? >> >> Thanks, >> >> José C. > >I am not obliged to say anything. The person who was the responsible that >answers your question. > >My matter is only Vincent who is not involved. OK? Sure, you're not obliged. But you sure understand we all want to know something more about this strange situation, hence I asked. I particularly would like to know what Bob has to say about all of this. If someone should be asked to determine if some program has Crafty's code, of course that's Bob. I hope he was asked; otherwise the decision would be very dubious. But none of this has to do with you, I just was hoping for some fresh information. BTW, did you get my email some weeks ago? I never got a reply :( José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.