Author: margolies,marc
Date: 15:47:53 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2003 at 18:23:40, Mridul Muralidharan wrote: >On November 27, 2003 at 18:02:25, margolies,marc wrote: > >>LIST is not accused of being a clone of anything. LIST's author is accused of >>PLAGIARIZING some of Dr. Hyatt's open code from Crafty and incorporating it >>based upon the contraversy and behavior of previous LIST versions--that is the >>foundation of the charge--not the behavior of the current list at the tourney. >>This is an ethical charge of not attributing work and the author is alleged to >>have failed to respond to the charge. >> >> > > >Assuming that it is plagarism that the accusation is refering to. > >Can it be proved that the PopCount() or Get_First_Bit_From_Bitboard() or >whatever crafty uses is plagarised by list ?! > >If you are going to get into specific code module plagarism - then how was the >accusation made in the first place ?!!! How did the accusor know about this >unless he has seen the code ?! >These are internal to the engine and just cant be observed from outside. >Hence we can safely conclude that it has to be some externally visible >component. > >So what could that be : > >EGTB ? , opening book ? learning ? cli syntax (!!!) ? > >I dont know how List supports all this - so cant comment on these. > >But these are trivial issues !!!! >To make such a serious accusation and ICGA following it up with such severe >action , due to such petty reasons is indeed extremely saddening. > > >Mridul > ><snip> >> >> >>On November 27, 2003 at 17:15:48, Mridul Muralidharan wrote:
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.