Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 17:06:32 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2003 at 19:45:11, Russell Reagan wrote: >On November 27, 2003 at 19:33:57, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>I know he is not but I have read such a nonsense this night that I dont really >>know what jokes are "goodwill jokes" or what jokes are "low sort jokes". >> >>Additionaly, I have replied in the same absurd level. Of course, You are right >>that I can be wrong from your point of view. :)))) > >You should stop being the defender of Vincent. Vincent has made wild, unfounded, >very serious accusations against respected members of the computer chess >community in the past and acted very immaturely on many occasions. It is his own >fault that people are suspecting him. > >You lose credibility yourself when you seemingly blindly defend someone who has >almost no credibility. People will stop taking you serious as well. Well, If I were known to write nonsense continously in this Forum, I could agree with your last point. However, It is for sure that helping Vincent for 2 years, I will be attacked in the same way either defending him or keeping silent. So your argument, with all my respect, is not weak. You should remember that "A lie said 1.000.000 time comes true". All the Forum accused Vincent Diepeveen without proofs. Today, all the Forum began to joke in bad way about Vincent Diepeveen. The person who was responsible about this issue will see if he is obliged to offer any explanation here (of course, I am not who will say the name because it is not my matter).- There are other people who attacks wildly here in this Forum and however you did not mention it. It would be interesting why? Remember, I am declaring he is not responsible (again) and *** I never post here ***, how can I lose my credibility according to your argument??? Really wondered how...... Regards, Arturo Ochoa M.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.