Author: Martin Andersen
Date: 17:22:26 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2003 at 20:05:22, Roger D Davis wrote: Cut. You didn't read carefully enough: "Programs which are discovered to be close derivatives of others (e.g., by playing nearly all moves the same)." Pay close attention to (...). Yes they claim to have some circumstantial evidence, if they had clear evidence they didn't need to ask for the source-code, but just ban him at once. It's very difficult, maybe impossible to prove that LIST is a Crafty clone without having the source-code. It would be silly if we had a tournament where half of the programmes where Crafty clones, but they couldn't be banned because nobody could prove it. It's all in the Tournament rules: We are in doubt, show us the code. Martin.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.