Author: Georg v. Zimmermann
Date: 17:24:01 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
> >So the committee felt it had an obligation to satisfy the complainant, when in >fact, the obligation of the committee was to request solid evidence from the >complainant, not circumstantial evidence. If you are a programmer, you know that this is not possible. Making clones look different from the original is too easy. The rules of the tourniament are not great, but it is as with Democracy. It is the best of all bad systems. >My theory, therefore, that the accuser has some special relationship with the >committee members. Who is the accuser to have such a special relationship? > Oh come on. Do we really have to read such crap in every second post here. You are smarter than this. Georg
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.