Author: David Dahlem
Date: 17:31:01 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2003 at 20:22:26, Martin Andersen wrote: >On November 27, 2003 at 20:05:22, Roger D Davis wrote: > > >Cut. > >You didn't read carefully enough: >"Programs which are discovered to be close derivatives of >others (e.g., by playing nearly all moves the same)." > >Pay close attention to (...). > >Yes they claim to have some circumstantial evidence, if >they had clear evidence they didn't need to ask for the source-code, but >just ban him at once. >It's very difficult, maybe impossible to prove that LIST is a Crafty clone >without having the source-code. > >It would be silly if we had a tournament where half of the programmes where >Crafty clones, but they couldn't be banned because nobody could prove it. >It's all in the Tournament rules: We are in doubt, show us the code. > >Martin. I'm not taking sides here, but suppose the Tournament rules causes the banning of completely innocent programmers? Regards Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.