Author: Roger D Davis
Date: 18:53:01 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2003 at 21:47:18, Terry McCracken wrote: >On November 27, 2003 at 21:34:18, Roger D Davis wrote: > >> >>> >>>There is no arguement, the rules are clear, look them up!! >> >>My point is that the rules are clear. I've stated my position in detail already >>through numerous posts. I'm asking you to provide support for your position, so >>that we can discuss it intelligently. If you say only that my position is >>nonsense, it becomes difficult for me to understand and benefit from your >>perspective. You have ample access to my perspective through my posts, but >>apparently, I am allowed no access to your perspective. >> >>Roger > >Yes you're wasting bandwidth. If you understand the rules, why argue the point? >I've no position, I'm impartial. > >The ICGA under their system reached a mutual decision. It's that simple. >Write them, if you feel it's wrong, or unfair, instead of wasting time posting >here and achieving nothing. > >We can't change what has happened, and complaining at CCC will not resolve the >issue. > >My POV is irrelavant. It will change nothing, debating it here. This is a discussion board. Whether change occurs is irrelevant. My purpose is to discuss the course of events in a logical manner. Your POV is irrelevant because you won't present it. My position might produce change. Yours is guaranteed not to produce change. Roger
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.