Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 19:36:52 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2003 at 22:34:47, Roger D Davis wrote: >>It's unlikely they banned the poor chap over suspect information alone. >> > >The chessbase letter states frankly that the evidence was circumstantial. If >they had positive proof that the code was bogus, they had no need to ask for the >source. > >Roger Shutup Roger, what is bogus is the diatribe you wrote in your prior post.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.