Author: Roger D Davis
Date: 19:39:39 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2003 at 22:36:52, Terry McCracken wrote: >On November 27, 2003 at 22:34:47, Roger D Davis wrote: > >>>It's unlikely they banned the poor chap over suspect information alone. >>> >> >>The chessbase letter states frankly that the evidence was circumstantial. If >>they had positive proof that the code was bogus, they had no need to ask for the >>source. >> >>Roger > >Shutup Roger, what is bogus is the diatribe you wrote in your prior post. I was trying to support my position with facts and logical argumentation. I thought I was doing a good job. I was not trying to provoke you. I refused to attack you personally, and I won't attack you personally now. Roger
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.