Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 20:22:42 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2003 at 23:08:30, Peter Kappler wrote: >On November 27, 2003 at 22:51:41, Rick Rice wrote: > >>Imagine the Ruffian author being put on the spot instead, and for some reason he >>wasn't able/didn't want to supply the source code. This message board would have >>been clogged up for months about the issue!! >> >>Regards, >>Rick > > >Apparently Vincent recently made an accusation against Ruffian's author. > >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?331141 This is another case and dont boil the spirits again. As a Diep Book Creator, I never agreed in that case because all the Proofs were circunstancial in my humble opinion. However, if you want to continue involving Vincent Diepeveen in the List Case without **** any proof ****, how can I call you? Slander.... Libel ..... Apparently, some people in this Forum doesnt have anything to do at home, looking for blaming somebody else. If you are so interested, why dont you ask directly to the ICGA. That is the easy way to find the responsible person. Suddenly, this Forum is fullful of nonsense today.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.