Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 20:37:34 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2003 at 23:23:25, Roger D Davis wrote: > >> >>Yes you are, ChessBase hasn't given enough information on the process of the >>ICGA, it's the very basics. You and I don't know the complete story or the >>process that the ICGA goes through. >> >>Until I know more I'd rather not go in circles with this. >> >>Terry > >The ICGA spelled out the process at the Chessbase site. They even quoted the >relevant section of their charter to justify their decision-making process. My >point is the section they quoted actually points out the ambiguities involved in >the process, and suggests that there were other courses of action that could >have been followed. > >But...you may be right that something else may emerge. I can't prove that it >won't emerge. If the ICGA was careless in the interpretation of their own >charter, as I believe, then they may have been equally careless in choosing >which facts to reveal. > >Roger Popycock! I'm glad you now understand the internal workings of the ICGA in its entirety. Yes I'm sure you have the case virtually solved, in virtual reality....
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.