Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 20:40:16 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2003 at 23:22:42, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >However, if you want to continue involving Vincent Diepeveen in the List Case >without **** any proof ****, how can I call you? Slander.... Libel ..... You make the common mistake of misunderstanding what slander and libel are. Unless you can show the false statements that people are saying, there is no slander or libel here. If I say, "I think it is likely that Vincent did it," that is not slander or libel. If I say, "I have first hand knowledge that Vincent intentionally fabricated evidence to mislead the ICGA to get List disqualified," AND you can prove that I am lying, AND you can prove that my intent in saying that was to cause damage to the reputation of Vincent, then it is possible that there is slander or libel.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.