Author: Roger D Davis
Date: 20:49:23 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2003 at 23:37:34, Terry McCracken wrote: >On November 27, 2003 at 23:23:25, Roger D Davis wrote: > >> >>> >>>Yes you are, ChessBase hasn't given enough information on the process of the >>>ICGA, it's the very basics. You and I don't know the complete story or the >>>process that the ICGA goes through. >>> >>>Until I know more I'd rather not go in circles with this. >>> >>>Terry >> >>The ICGA spelled out the process at the Chessbase site. They even quoted the >>relevant section of their charter to justify their decision-making process. My >>point is the section they quoted actually points out the ambiguities involved in >>the process, and suggests that there were other courses of action that could >>have been followed. >> >>But...you may be right that something else may emerge. I can't prove that it >>won't emerge. If the ICGA was careless in the interpretation of their own >>charter, as I believe, then they may have been equally careless in choosing >>which facts to reveal. >> >>Roger > >Popycock! I'm glad you now understand the internal workings of the ICGA in its >entirety. > >Yes I'm sure you have the case virtually solved, in virtual reality.... Thank you for your faith in me. Roger
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.