Author: David Dahlem
Date: 21:06:19 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2003 at 23:53:50, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>Unless you can show the false statements that people are saying, there is no >>slander or libel here. If I say, "I think it is likely that Vincent did it," >>that is not slander or libel. If I say, "I have first hand knowledge that >>Vincent intentionally fabricated evidence to mislead the ICGA to get List >>disqualified," AND you can prove that I am lying, AND you can prove that my >>intent in saying that was to cause damage to the reputation of Vincent, then it >>is possible that there is slander or libel. > >If you accuse somebody about something that is false is slander and libel. >Diepeveen is being acussed of being the responsible of the List Case. If you >cannot understand that this is slander or libel, I point out you the >definitions: > >Slander: to say untrue things about someone in order to damage other people´s >good opinion of them. > >Libel: an act of writing or printing untrue statements about someone so that >other people are likely to have a bad opinion. > > >When you establish or say untrue things about Vincent Diepeveen such as the List >Case, you are creating a bad belief of this person. How can you call it? > >Accusing him about the List Case is slander. And what is it called when someone falsely accusses a programmer of plagarism? Regards Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.