Author: Chessfun
Date: 23:13:55 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 28, 2003 at 01:44:11, Will Singleton wrote: >On November 28, 2003 at 00:13:18, Chessfun wrote: > >>On November 27, 2003 at 23:39:15, Will Singleton wrote: >> >>>I don't quite understand all the hysteria here. It was a very simple decision. >>>The author failed to comply with one of the rules, and was disqualified. >>> >>>If it had been my call, I would not have mentioned anything concerning Crafty or >>>any of the allegations. I would simply have said that the author had not >>>complied with a request of the organizer, and was disqualified. End of story. >> >> >>That's quite right IMO and where you should have ended the story. >> >> >>>Note that I have no idea or opinion concerning the clone issue. I would point >>>out, however, that the author's failure to comply with the rules indicates guilt >>>of some sort. >> >> >>Naturally that is not right. Clearly any author has the right to choose NOT to >>show his source code. I have no opinion either way as I know nothing about >>programming and like everyone else have NO details on the source code of List. >> >>But to say that simply choosing not to reveal his source code indicates guilt >>isn't right as it isn't a rule. It becomes a rule upon the question being >>raised. >> > >Huh? Either this is a troll or you live in an alternate universe. Your >statements make no sense. Please try to engage brain before keyboard in future, >missy. Excuse me, but I don't post trolls. Others seemed to understand, maybe it was too deep for you, nevermind. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.