Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 01:13:55 11/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 28, 2003 at 00:43:03, Russell Reagan wrote: >On November 27, 2003 at 23:53:50, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>>Unless you can show the false statements that people are saying, there is no >>>slander or libel here. > >>Slander: to say untrue things about someone in order to damage other people´s >>good opinion of them. > >>Libel: an act of writing or printing untrue statements about someone so that >>other people are likely to have a bad opinion. > >Please show me where someone said something false about Vincent with the intent >to damage his good name. Many would say it is debatable if he even has a good >name in this community. Even if you find a handful of posts where someone said >something false about Vincent, I doubt you will find many. Most say something >along the lines of that it would not suprise them if he was responsible. That >is not "saying something false". If I said: It would not surprise me that you were hacking the nicknames here of the other integrants of this community to blame people of insulting messages. Would you like it? More, if I began to accuse you about that, would you like it? Then, I began to repeat the same lie over and over. Would you like that? I would say that it is debatable that you understand the meaning of these words and it is useless to bring the meaning of them so you clarified thei meaning. Why to spend my time in your absurd arguments if you dont understand the meaning of these words?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.