Author: Aaron Gordon
Date: 02:10:29 11/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 28, 2003 at 04:44:08, Jim Bodkins wrote: >I'm not defending List. I dont care about List. (Sorry Mr. Reul). But the >process seems questionable. It's the process, standards etc that need to be >looked at and that I have been commenting on. What about having all non-commercial programs send their sources in before any of the events? Maybe have the event staff look it over the source and binary before the event itself. Ff any changes were made (small evaluation type stuff, aggressiveness, whatever small changes) before the event you could resubmit the changes unless it is a last minute thing. Then, AFTER the event resubmit the source and binary with noted changes. That way they can go through the games with the binaries used & check the games.. plus.. they'd have the source there to look over as well. I'd also like to see full confidentiality of the data, too, incase any amateur programs are aspiring to become commercial some day and would rather not have their source picked through. This would mean a lot of trust to event staff.. but.. what else can we do?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.