Author: martin fierz
Date: 02:55:22 11/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 28, 2003 at 04:46:25, Sune Fischer wrote: [snip] >If I was on location I could agree to them quickly eye-browsing a few source >files, too fast to remember but slow enough to witness it wasn't crafty. >That's about as far as I could go. i like your idea of "eye-browsing". e.g. the ICGA could suggest that they want to look at your move generator, or at your alphabeta routine, or at your evaluation - it has been suggested that many filenames in list are the same as in crafty, so they could say they want to look at those files. first, they would check out the corresponding parts in crafty, then they could sit down and look at your source for a couple of minutes. if it's not a clone, that should be very clear with such an inspection. if they are still not convinced, they could grill you further. such a quick test would certainly be good enough to remove a groundless accusation. it also seems to me that nobody looking at my source code for 5-10 minutes would get any idea whatsoever what my program is doing :-) cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.