Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 13:41:32 11/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 28, 2003 at 16:07:25, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: [snip] >The question is whether the demand to inspect the source code had been based on >a _reasonable_ accusation. All we have heard so far about that is that "the >complaint is supported by circumstantial evidence". Well, at least Thomas Mayer said that he also saw the reasons for the complaint and that it was at least very suspicious in his opinion. (http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?331484) >Frankly, I have no idea >about the meaning of this. I hope we will know one day. :( I hope that too. Unfortunately we don't know yet whether the reasons will be made public or not. Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.