Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ICGA decision was correct

Author: jefkaan

Date: 14:43:07 11/28/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 28, 2003 at 16:18:04, Roberto Nerici wrote:

>I can't see any risk in someone seeing List's code who wasn't meant to see

agree, but.. an accusation that some new program is a 'crafty clone'
is an old story, and an easy accusation, maybe as most people
know Crafty.
In fact there are many open source chess programs, and some
of them are quite good quality; any skilled programmer could
have a look at such sources, and to the theory of chess
programming, and come up with a new program.

But then he should ofcourse be honest about it,
especially in the beginning, or when participating
in tournaments. After a while, when trying to advance
the program further the program would either be deviating
more and more from the original sources, thus becoming
less of a 'clone', or the programmer would even make
some giant step backwards and decide to start all over
again, i.e. starting from scratch. Either way
its a difficult and timeconsuming process.

So if a program isnt completely made from scratch,
well so what, i would say, no need to reinvent
the alfa/beta routines yourself, you know :)
And no need for a witch hunt, which anyway
the programmer could easily avoid by providing
more openness about the sources and/or show
parts of it to an independent and uncommercial
intermediate person, like eg. prof Heinz.

But in the case of well-established programs
as Tiger, Shredder, Quest/Fritz, Junior, etc.
well personally i dont see why they should be
obliged to show their source codes (or even part
of it, to an intermediary); their playing strength
by itself already is enough reason to  participate
as independent program, isnt it ?

ok not all of you may agree with my view,
but its currently how i see it and quite
frankly i find the whole thing about disqualification
(of List) a bit overdone (even although the
decision appears to be right) Nowadays
opening books are anyway getting more
and more important, compared to
simple little engines :)))))))))))))




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.