Author: Slater Wold
Date: 00:34:21 11/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 2003 at 03:21:09, swaminathan natarajan wrote: >Hi > >try >List 5.04 vs crafty 17.11(i'm not sure 17.11 or 17.10) >crafty for fritz 6 >they are of same strenght and produce similar results LIST 504 is stronger... >why do they(some CCC people including Amir Ban) compare analysis of crafty >19.03(latest version) with List 5.04 I don't think anyone has compared it to a specific version, except you! >search for the date of List 5.04 release >then search for the version of crafty which was released before that date >crafty version must be older must be before 17.10 504 is new. ~3 months or so. >then check analysis of all crafty versions which came before date of list >release I have 17.11. It's not the same at all. I tried 17.11 and it plays the same moves as 19.06, which are different from LIST 504! >another secret kept by Reul > >Fritz Reul didnt mention the programming language he used for List,the question >in wbec-ridderkerk info pages So he can clone a Crafty 100+ points stronger than Crafty, but he's not smart enough to know what language he's using? COME ON! >and wait for a day to come >Ruffian leiden version had already been inspected by ICGA >why wouldnt Reul give the source to the David Levy? The same reason he wasn't in Graz, maybe? He had more pressing issues? >using Hex editor to view .dll files >it had been found that author had used some 6 or 7 files name same as crafty's >how could that be? It's also the same .c files in Gerbil, GNUChess, and probably a ton more, if you Hex'ed them. They are common names. Means *nothing*. >List size is only 44kb and crafty's around 258kb You don't insult someone to this magnitude, because of a 'hunch'. It's just not right what's been done.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.