Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 01:22:48 11/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 2003 at 01:30:22, Slater Wold wrote: >http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2003551689,00.html > >--- > >One expert said: “LIST was playing out of its skin. We were shocked by some of >the great moves it came up with. People started to smell a rat.” > > >There's your 'circumstantial evidence'. > > > >And just FYI, here's two tourney's I ran last month: > >10.15.2003 >Blitz:10'+10" > > 123456789012345678901234567890 >1 List 504 11101½½0½1½½1½0½½½½½½0110½0½½0 15.5/30 >2 Ruffian 1.0.5 00010½½1½0½½0½1½½½½½½1001½1½½1 14.5/30 > That's what had made me become a kind of fan of List. It's a tactical wizard: in many positions where Comet searches a minute to find the solution move, List displays it after a few seconds. My feeling is that its tactical abilities are also clearly beyond the ones of Crafty. Furtermore, style of play, nps and depths differ clearly. Thus, it had surprised me a lot that the clone accusation had been taken seriously. I am still hoping that ICGA will let us know what it had been based upon. Uli > >10.10.2003 >Blitz:10'+10" > > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 >1 Shredder 7.04 2800 -110 * ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 1 ½ 1 1 7.0/9 >2 Fritz 7 2600 +14 ½ * ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 1 1 0 6.0/9 26.00 >3 Junior 6.0 2600 +14 ½ ½ * ½ 1 1 0 1 ½ 1 6.0/9 25.00 >4 List 504 2350 +250 0 0 ½ * ½ 1 1 1 ½ 1 5.5/9 >5 smarthink 2400 +155 0 ½ 0 ½ * 1 ½ ½ 1 1 5.0/9 >6 Hiarcs 7.32 2550 -88 ½ ½ 0 0 0 * 0 1 1 1 4.0/9 >7 Crafty 19.03 2400 +38 0 0 1 0 ½ 1 * ½ ½ 0 3.5/9 15.50 >8 Tao 5.4 2400 +38 ½ 0 0 0 ½ 0 ½ * 1 1 3.5/9 12.25 >9 Ruffian 1.0.5 2450 -104 0 0 ½ ½ 0 0 ½ 0 * 1 2.5/9 >10 Rebel 12 2500 -212 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 * 2.0/9 > > > >I would be more than happy to send the games to anyone who would like them.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.